Same Old Same Old

So it's the miscegenation, not the incest, which you can't bear.

— William Faulkner

Serious students of the American Civil War understand the causes to be twofold:

1. Rich Southerners' unremitting greed; and
    
2. All Southerners' fear of miscegenation.

Yesterday, Republican Senator Mike Braun told a reporter that states not only should decide whether abortion should be legal, but whether interracial marriage should.

"You can list a whole host of issues," Braun said, "but when it comes down to whatever they are, I’m going to say that they’re not going to all make you happy within a given state. We’re better off having states manifest their points of view, rather than homogenizing it across the country, as Roe v. Wade did."

Same old same old.

Attack!

Vulnerability scanning by Russians indicates the Kremlin is "exploring options for potential cyberattacks" President Biden warned yesterday.

"Harden your cyber defenses immediately."

Biden called cyberattack readiness a "patriotic obligation."

While big businesses are the likely target of the Russians, small ones are the most frequent target of cyberattacks in peacetime, according to Barracuda Networks.

A study by the cybersecurity firm found the average employee of a small business experiences over three times the number of cyberattacks that her counterpart at a large business does.

Fraudsters set their sights most often on small businesses because big ones have expensive safeguards in place.

CEOs and CFOs are the most common targets of the attacks.

Given their privileged access to systems, executive assistants are also popular targets, according to Forbes columnist Edward Segal.

Fraudsters in peacetime primarily use email to hack into and take over a business's computers, which they then hold for ransom.

Cybersecurity experts say at least one-third of small businesses are vulnerable.

More frightening than a systems takeover is fund-transfer fraud—because it's easier to pull off.

Fund-transfer fraud losses increased nearly 70% from 2020 to 2021, according to PropertyCasualty360.

Fund-transfer fraud is "one of the easier ways to monetize a cyberattack," the magazine reports.

Fraudsters use email to hack into a company and modify payment instructions on purchase orders and contracts.

They also send fake payment instructions that appear to come from vendors.

The average loss in late 2021 was $347,000.

Once again, small businesses are the most likely targets.

Fund-transfer fraud is not only easy, but potentially more profitable than a systems takeover.

That's because small businesses are less apt to pay a ransom for their computers. 

"Small businesses typically have less digital infrastructure, leaving hackers with less leverage during a ransomware negotiation," PropertyCasualty360 says.

How about you?

Are you prepared for a cyberattack?

Exile on Main Street

The artist has no more actual place in the American culture of today than he has in the American economy of today.

— William Faulkner

I'm flattered so many friends and acquaintances have taken well to my choice of an "encore" career.

At the same time, I'm saddened that I can only pursue painting as a career because I don't depend on it for the lion's share of my income.

My hat's off to those painters—successful or not—who found the cajones to try in their youth to paint for a living.

Faulkner was right to say the artist "has no place in the mosaic of the American dream as it exists today."

The average American artist, according to the Labor Department, earns $50,300 a year. That's $10,000 less than a clerk at the post office (a job Faulkner held as a young man, until he was fired for throwing away mail).

Of course remorse isn't good for the soul; and calling America materialistic is trite.

But as Wassily Kandinsky observed, "The nightmare of materialism, which has turned the life of the universe into an evil, useless game, is not yet past; it holds the awakening soul still in its grip."

Terror

 

I was not predicting the future, I was trying to prevent it.

― Ray Bradbury

A year ago, I urged live event organizers to prepare for domestic terror.

Sadly, that prediction proved correct last night.

Strongmen

A friend who posts reactionary memes every day on Facebook admitted to me he not only gets his jollies provoking "your kind," but secretly wishes Trump were president.

You probably know a lot of people like him.

I wish they'd all read Strongmen, historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat's 2020 account of modern authoritarianism, now out in paperback.

It's the scariest read you'll find outside a Stephen King novel.

Ben-Ghiat finds every modern strongman—including Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, Amin, Pinochet, Erdogan, Duterte, Bolsonaro, Berlusconi, Gaddafi, Hussein, Orban, Putin, Modi and Trump—cut from precisely the same vile cloth.

Strongmen are all emotionally stunted weirdos who seize the levers of power because dominion over others fills an inner need to prove they're not emotionally stunted weirdos.

They're masters in the dual arts of disguise and deceit.   

"They don the cloak of national victimhood, reliving the humiliations of their people by foreign powers as they proclaim themselves their nation's savior," Ben-Ghiat writes. 

"Picking up on powerful resentments, hopes, and fears," she continues, "strongmen present themselves as the vehicle for obtaining what is most wanted, whether it is territory, safety from racial others, securing male authority, or payback for exploitation by internal or external enemies."

Strongmen rely on distortions, myths, lies, and propaganda to build a faithful audience, banking on followers' willingness to abandon the real world in favor of the fantasy world the strongmen create.

Eventually—as in the case of my misguided friend—there's no talking to a strongman's followers.

"They believe in him because they believe in him," Ben-Ghiat writes. 

Their unshakable faith in the strongman leads them to insist you—by believing in a world where people strive to live in peace, right systemic wrongs, and work for prosperity and progress—are "drinking the Kool-Aid."

But strongmen really don't give two shits about their followers and, in fact, are openly contemptuous of them. 

All they really care about is robbing the treasury, punishing critics, controlling women and women's bodies, and pursuing vainglorious goals.

Soon—to every other citizen's detriment—chaos, bankruptcy, and warfare ensue, as strongmen lose what little is left of their ability to distinguish the difference between personal lusts and their nation's needs.

Their sick, self-aggrandizing projects invariably lead to their comeuppance and to a national apocalypse, as our parents witnessed in World War II and we're witnessing in Ukraine now.

"Authoritarian history is full of projects and causes championed by the ruler out of hubris and megalomania and implemented to disastrous effect," Ben-Ghiat writes.

Why don't Trump's followers see that?

POSTSCRIPT: Should you find the inclusion of Trump in the company of strongmen like Mussolini and Hitler far fetched, bare in mind that Trump's press secretary has acknowledged he openly admired other dictators' ruthlessness.

"I think he wanted to be able to kill whoever spoke out against him," Stephanie Grisham told The Hill. "He loved the people who could kill anyone."

Historian Ben-Ghiat says the "strongman's golden rule is: do whatever is necessary to stay in power."

We see Trump apply that rule every day.